IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hugh McGuigan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHLP 40 13 19 32 0.800 0.0520 0.0520 0.1802 0.1802
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHLP 31 10 22 32 1.032 0.0671 0.0671 0.2325 0.2325
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 20 4 3 7 0.350 0.0512 0.0534 0.1716 0.1790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 SR 24 1 6 7 0.292
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 JR 24 3 3 6 0.250
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SO 24 2 3 5 0.208
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 FR 15 1 1 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Post
+191.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36147
Forward overall
#2205
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Clayton
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Fisher
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Konnor Carlson
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.