← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drake Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-12-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 9 0 4 4 0.444 0.0558 0.0562 0.1403 0.1412
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 35 1 10 11 0.314 0.0394 0.0377 0.0992 0.0948
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21832
Defenseman overall
#2509
Defenseman born in 1996
#3654
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2017-18
0.120 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.