← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Cantelmo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pomfret NE-Prep 30 3 4 7 0.233 0.0462 0.0462 0.1063 0.1063
2019-20 Pomfret NE-Prep 28 0 1 1 0.036 0.0071 0.0071 0.0163 0.0163
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 34 7 16 23 0.676 0.0885 0.0885 0.2296 0.2296
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 34 7 17 24 0.706 0.1631 0.1573 0.3454 0.3332
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · Southern New Hampshire
+26.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30687
Forward overall
#1631
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.