IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Chirico Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 38 5 15 20 0.526 0.0770 0.0770 0.2580 0.2580
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 46 8 20 28 0.609 0.0891 0.0877 0.2984 0.2936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 24 0 1 1 0.042
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 4 6 0.250
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · SUNY Brockport
+119.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6509
Defenseman overall
#1439
Defenseman born in 2001
#808
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bittner
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Tenezaca
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Deschamps
Rivier · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.