| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Pickering Panthers | OJHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2007-08 | Hawkesbury Hawks | CCHL | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.091 | 0.0259 | 0.0253 | 0.0704 | 0.0687 |
| 2008-09 | King Rebellion | OJHL | 25 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.600 | 0.1676 | 0.1539 | 0.4141 | 0.3803 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Lake Forest | D3 | — | FR | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.