← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Goldowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Albany Academy NE-Prep 27 2 2 4 0.148 0.0299 0.0299 0.0678 0.0678
2020-21 Northern Cyclones NCDC 29 8 7 15 0.517 0.1457 0.1457 0.4187 0.4187
2021-22 Northern Cyclones NCDC 48 17 23 40 0.833 0.2348 0.2248 0.6746 0.6458
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE SR 28 8 9 17 0.607
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE JR 28 8 4 12 0.429
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE SO 26 5 7 12 0.462
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Endicott
+13.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26027
Forward overall
#1001
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.