IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Worob Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.2311 0.2311 0.8086 0.8086
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.0420 0.0420 0.1470 0.1470
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 49 14 21 35 0.714 0.1651 0.1543 0.5776 0.5398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 27 6 7 13 0.481
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 22 5 4 9 0.409
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 12 0 5 5 0.417
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Skidmore
-5.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18073
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 2001
#537
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.