← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Worob Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.4077 0.4077 0.8038 0.8038
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.0741 0.0741 0.1461 0.1461
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 49 14 21 35 0.714 0.2912 0.2721 0.5742 0.5366
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 27 6 7 13 0.481
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 22 5 4 9 0.409
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 12 0 5 5 0.417
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Skidmore
-46.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15846
Forward overall
#746
Forward born in 2001
#525
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.