← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Gillette Wild NA3HL 46 44 41 85 1.848 0.2319 0.2319 0.5834 0.5834
2020-21 Gillette Wild NA3HL 39 38 32 70 1.795 0.2253 0.2253 0.5666 0.5666
2021-22 Gillette Wild NA3HL 47 48 40 88 1.872 0.2350 0.2183 0.5911 0.5491
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 16 0 4 4 0.250
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 7 1 0 1 0.143
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · St. Scholastica
-58.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8211
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 2001
#48
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.