| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Gillette Wild | NA3HL | 46 | 44 | 41 | 85 | 1.848 | 0.2044 | 0.2044 | 0.5854 | 0.5854 |
| 2020-21 | Gillette Wild | NA3HL | 39 | 38 | 32 | 70 | 1.795 | 0.1985 | 0.1985 | 0.5686 | 0.5686 |
| 2021-22 | Gillette Wild | NA3HL | 47 | 48 | 40 | 88 | 1.872 | 0.2071 | 0.1924 | 0.5931 | 0.5510 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | SR | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2024-25 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | JR | 16 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.250 |
| 2023-24 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | SO | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2022-23 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | FR | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.077 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.