← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 37 23 20 43 1.162 0.1311 0.1311 0.3954 0.3954
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 34 15 35 50 1.471 0.1659 0.1659 0.5003 0.5003
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 33 7 13 20 0.606 0.0684 0.0633 0.2062 0.1909
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 7 6 13 0.500
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 23 5 3 8 0.348
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 16 1 0 1 0.062
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2022-23 · Salem State
-26.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12930
Forward overall
#576
Forward born in 2001
#707
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.