| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Worcester Jr. Railers | EHL | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.067 | 0.0154 | 0.0154 | 0.0326 | 0.0326 |
| 2021-22 | Worcester Jr. Railers | EHL | 43 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.186 | 0.0430 | 0.0415 | 0.0910 | 0.0879 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 25 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.520 |
| 2024-25 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 25 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.560 |
| 2023-24 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 25 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.320 |
| 2022-23 | Framingham State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.