IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Barcelou Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 15 1 0 1 0.067 0.0098 0.0098 0.0327 0.0327
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 43 3 5 8 0.186 0.0272 0.0263 0.0912 0.0881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 25 5 9 14 0.560
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2022-23 · Framingham State
+61.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24320
Defenseman overall
#3431
Defenseman born in 2001
#2810
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Angel Montanez
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Madej
Adrian · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hale
Augsburg · 2021-22
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.