IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHLP 28 5 2 7 0.250 0.0163 0.0163 0.0563 0.0563
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 4 2 6 0.133 0.0195 0.0197 0.0654 0.0662
2023-24 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 3 7 10 0.222 0.0325 0.0313 0.1089 0.1048
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 14 0 3 3 0.214
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54024
Forward overall
#3708
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ean Mendeszoon
Nazareth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Ramaekers
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Mazzotta
Johnson & Wales · 2012-13
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.