IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Gethings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Academy NE-Prep 30 1 9 10 0.333 0.0643 0.0643 0.1525 0.1525
2021-22 Worcester Academy NE-Prep 24 4 8 12 0.500 0.0964 0.0964 0.2288 0.2288
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 35 1 6 7 0.200 0.0293 0.0280 0.0981 0.0937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC — 11 1 0 1 0.091
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC — 18 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17255
Defenseman overall
#3110
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilson McCloy
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Schenfeld
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Martin Sundstedt
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.