IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leo Piandes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 12 2 9 11 0.917 0.1816 0.1816 0.4176 0.4176
2021-22 Tilton NE-Prep 23 4 36 40 1.739 0.3445 0.3445 0.7923 0.7923
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 31 5 13 18 0.581 0.2367 0.2393 0.4667 0.4719
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 32 14 26 40 1.250
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 31 7 13 20 0.645
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 SO 27 12 15 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2023-24 · Assumption
+315.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10306
Forward overall
#457
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Karty
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2013-14
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Humphrey
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Stirzinger
Aurora · 2014-15
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.