← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Burlington Cougars OJHL 40 2 9 11 0.275 0.0674 0.0750 0.1882 0.2095
2019-20 Milton Menace OJHL 42 21 12 33 0.786 0.1926 0.1926 0.5378 0.5378
2020-21 Milton Menace OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Milton Menace OJHL 52 16 30 46 0.885 0.2168 0.2097 0.6055 0.5857
2022-23 Milton Menace OJHL 53 31 45 76 1.434 0.3515 0.3220 0.9816 0.8993
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC GR 12 6 7 13 1.083
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC SR 28 5 7 12 0.429
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC JR 30 8 17 25 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2023-24 · Utica
+251.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12776
Forward overall
#638
Forward born in 2002
#352
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.