IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Lally Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 0 4 4 0.148 0.0286 0.0286 0.0678 0.0678
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 12 4 11 15 1.250 0.2411 0.2411 0.5720 0.5720
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 48 3 20 23 0.479 0.1107 0.1107 0.3875 0.3876
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 49 7 33 40 0.816 0.1886 0.1807 0.6601 0.6325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 31 14 25 39 1.258
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 2 15 17 0.548
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 4 15 19 0.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2023-24 · Hobart
+370.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2025
Defenseman overall
#496
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Deaglan Kelly
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.