IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Lally Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tilton NE-Prep 27 0 4 4 0.148 0.0298 0.0298 0.0677 0.0677
2020-21 Tilton NE-Prep 12 4 11 15 1.250 0.2514 0.2514 0.5716 0.5716
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 48 3 20 23 0.479 0.1954 0.1954 0.3835 0.3835
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 49 7 33 40 0.816 0.3328 0.3189 0.6532 0.6259
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 31 14 25 39 1.258
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 2 15 17 0.548
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 4 15 19 0.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2023-24 · Hobart
+166.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1865
Defenseman overall
#468
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Stirzinger
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.