IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael DiPietra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 11 16 27 0.540 0.2202 0.2202 0.4341 0.4341
2020-21 — NCDC 34 4 3 7 0.206 0.0839 0.0839 0.1655 0.1655
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 49 10 25 35 0.714 0.2912 0.2885 0.5742 0.5688
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 50 17 35 52 1.040 0.4240 0.4023 0.8360 0.7931
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA GR 28 4 7 11 0.393
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA SR 30 3 17 20 0.667
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA JR 25 7 8 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2023-24 · Trine
+96.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7033
Forward overall
#324
Forward born in 2002
#149
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Coleman Jenkins
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Ross
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.