← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael DiPietra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 11 16 27 0.540 0.1248 0.1248 0.4366 0.4366
2020-21 NCDC 34 4 3 7 0.206 0.0476 0.0476 0.1665 0.1665
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 49 10 25 35 0.714 0.1651 0.1636 0.5776 0.5722
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 50 17 35 52 1.040 0.2403 0.2280 0.8409 0.7978
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA GR 28 4 7 11 0.393
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA SR 30 3 17 20 0.667
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA JR 25 7 8 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2023-24 · Trine
+246.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8068
Forward overall
#377
Forward born in 2002
#157
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.