IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Freeman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Middlesex NE-Prep 24 0 5 5 0.208 0.0402 0.0402 0.0953 0.0953
2019-20 Middlesex NE-Prep 23 4 8 12 0.522 0.1006 0.1006 0.2387 0.2387
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 31 2 8 10 0.323 0.0472 0.0478 0.1582 0.1602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2024-25 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 23 3 11 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2023-24 · Johnson & Wales
+835.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15201
Defenseman overall
#2852
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Kenney
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.136 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Perry
Becker · 2015-16
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Gillmore
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.