IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0193 0.0201 0.0674 0.0702
2022-23 Northern Cyclones NCDC 19 0 3 3 0.158 0.0365 0.0365 0.1277 0.1277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 13 18 31 1.192
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 29 13 14 27 0.931
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2023-24 · Fitchburg State
+1775.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52898
Forward overall
#3609
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Prestia
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Angelo Vrachnas
Southern Maine · 2008-09
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Mazzotta
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.