IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mazzotta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 35 1 7 8 0.229 0.0812 0.0802 0.2411 0.2382
2012-13 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 52 3 7 10 0.192 0.0683 0.0640 0.2028 0.1901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 1 10 11 0.440
2015-16 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 27 5 8 13 0.481
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 27 6 9 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2013-14 · Johnson & Wales
+735.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20034
Defenseman overall
#1941
Defenseman born in 1992
#5780
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Salas
SUNY Potsdam · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Guiguet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Willett
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.