IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 53 1 4 5 0.094 0.0205 0.0220 0.0730 0.0782
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 49 2 10 12 0.245 0.0531 0.0541 0.1895 0.1932
2017-18 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 15 22 37 0.649 0.1408 0.1363 0.5022 0.4860
2018-19 — CCHL 60 10 14 24 0.400 0.0868 0.0801 0.3095 0.2858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Skidmore D1 SUNYAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Skidmore
+395.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11680
Defenseman overall
#1977
Defenseman born in 1998
#993
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Sandberg
Nichols · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
Hobart · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Norman
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.