← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Doughart-Wood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 35 3 7 10 0.286 0.0322 0.0322 0.0972 0.0972
2021-22 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0271 0.0259 0.0968 0.0926
2022-23 CCHL 48 2 8 10 0.208 0.0452 0.0412 0.1612 0.1470
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 25 4 13 17 0.680
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 26 1 3 4 0.154
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2023-24 · SUNY Potsdam
+987.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22782
Defenseman overall
#3546
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.