← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 28 5 6 11 0.393 0.0293 0.0315 0.0900 0.0968
2019-20 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0451 0.0451 0.1361 0.1361
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 42 4 14 18 0.429 0.0627 0.0630 0.2101 0.2111
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 9 30 39 0.867 0.1268 0.1208 0.4249 0.4049
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC GR 26 3 4 7 0.269
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 27 3 5 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Fitchburg State
+254.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30214
Forward overall
#1773
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.