IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Noonan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 38 15 25 40 1.053 0.1377 0.1377 0.3573 0.3573
2021-22 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 40 20 27 47 1.175 0.1537 0.1497 0.3988 0.3885
2022-23 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 38 12 13 25 0.658 0.0861 0.0796 0.2233 0.2065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 12 0 3 3 0.250
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 19 1 7 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Lawrence
+357.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16026
Forward overall
#835
Forward born in 2002
#947
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Simon Diaz
Aurora · 2023-24
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Chambers
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Stuntz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.