← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson James Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berwick NE-Prep 28 12 11 23 0.821 0.1652 0.1652 0.3756 0.3756
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep 27 17 18 35 1.296 0.2607 0.2607 0.5928 0.5928
2020-21 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.0742 0.0755 0.1572 0.1599
2022-23 Seacoast Spartans EHL 46 10 14 24 0.522 0.1205 0.1163 0.2552 0.2464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Salem State
+227.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28531
Forward overall
#1664
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2008-09
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.