← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson James Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berwick NE-Prep 28 12 11 23 0.821 0.1584 0.1584 0.3759 0.3759
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep 27 17 18 35 1.296 0.2501 0.2501 0.5932 0.5932
2020-21 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.0470 0.0478 0.1576 0.1603
2022-23 Seacoast Spartans EHL 46 10 14 24 0.522 0.0763 0.0737 0.2558 0.2470
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Salem State
+416.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27719
Forward overall
#1606
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.