IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mattingly Wierl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Maine Eclipse EHL 13 3 7 10 0.769 0.1125 0.1125 0.3771 0.3771
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 43 14 22 36 0.837 0.1225 0.1274 0.4105 0.4270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 2 4 0.191
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 10 4 2 6 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2023-24 · Bowdoin
+450.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17134
Forward overall
#856
Forward born in 2003
#332
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Juron
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Westmark
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.