← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan D'Elia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHLP 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0186 0.0203 0.0645 0.0706
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 37 12 11 23 0.622 0.0701 0.0696 0.2110 0.2095
2022-23 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 19 28 47 1.068 0.1564 0.1521 0.5232 0.5090
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC GR 24 5 8 13 0.542
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 17 2 4 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Manhattanville
+246.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15487
Forward overall
#791
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.