IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Crook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Oklahoma City Ice Hawks NA3HL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0269 0.0269 — —
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 39 10 20 30 0.769 0.1006 0.1017 0.2611 0.2639
2022-23 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 19 17 36 0.818 0.1070 0.1029 0.2777 0.2670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE GR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2024-25 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 24 2 5 7 0.292
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · Johnson & Wales
+185.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26241
Forward overall
#1480
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Declan Bronte
Salem State · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Totten
Finlandia · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gunner Vignaroli
Salem State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.