← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daisuke Egusa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-23 Country: Japan
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 46 8 21 29 0.630 0.0697 0.0697 0.1997 0.1997
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 45 1 10 11 0.244 0.0565 0.0558 0.1976 0.1953
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 49 1 11 12 0.245 0.0566 0.0536 0.1980 0.1874
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC GR 26 1 4 5 0.192
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Nazareth
+349.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11884
Defenseman overall
#2406
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.