← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Pattison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 26 2 1 3 0.115 0.0428 0.0428 0.1222 0.1222
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 51 4 10 14 0.275 0.1019 0.1019 0.2906 0.2906
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 56 4 16 20 0.357 0.1326 0.1250 0.3781 0.3565
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 26 5 4 9 0.346
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 24 6 7 13 0.542
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 23 8 4 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Albertus Magnus
+387.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37545
Forward overall
#1661
Forward born in 2001
#4816
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.