← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Zarcone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 5 10 15 0.455 0.0877 0.0877 0.2080 0.2080
2019-20 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 34 7 8 15 0.441 0.0851 0.0851 0.2019 0.2019
2020-21 NCDC 34 4 3 7 0.206 0.0476 0.0476 0.1665 0.1665
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 7 10 17 0.362 0.0836 0.0820 0.2925 0.2868
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 10 13 23 0.460 0.1063 0.0998 0.3720 0.3491
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC GR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 4 2 6 0.240
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 25 1 5 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2023-24 · Connecticut College
+202.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27063
Forward overall
#1553
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.