IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Imbriano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 45 5 9 14 0.311 0.0719 0.0737 0.2516 0.2581
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC SR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC JR 24 6 4 10 0.417
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC SO 24 1 4 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Alvernia
+230.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32432
Forward overall
#1947
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Aitcheson
Becker · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Cozine
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon O'Quinn
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.