IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Broadfoot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 18 1 6 7 0.389 0.0898 0.0904 0.1903 0.1916
2022-23 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 43 23 25 48 1.116 0.2579 0.2463 0.5462 0.5215
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 13 2 2 4 0.308
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 14 2 2 4 0.286

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17659
Forward overall
#932
Forward born in 2002
#332
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Wishart
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Corcoran
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.