IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Singher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 45 1 16 17 0.378 0.0926 0.0918 0.2586 0.2564
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 55 4 20 24 0.436 0.0947 0.0898 0.3378 0.3204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 13 0 2 2 0.154
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+79.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13000
Defenseman overall
#2546
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Lynes
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Nelson
St. Thomas · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Zeggil
Castleton · 2008-09
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.