← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.P. Moreira Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 39 4 12 16 0.410 0.0584 0.0584 0.1702 0.1702
2020-21 Collingwood Blues OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 OJHL 36 3 8 11 0.306 0.0749 0.0730 0.2092 0.2038
2022-23 OJHL 40 9 20 29 0.725 0.1777 0.1640 0.4963 0.4580
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE GR 18 1 6 7 0.389
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE SR 22 1 6 7 0.318
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE JR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2023-24 · Curry
-7.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10589
Defenseman overall
#2234
Defenseman born in 2002
#2212
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.