IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Choueiri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 12 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Premier 42 3 21 24 0.571 0.0645 0.0662 0.1944 0.1994
2022-23 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 52 1 9 10 0.192 0.0417 0.0404 0.1489 0.1442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 1 0 1 0.040
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · Manhattanville
+98.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19003
Defenseman overall
#3299
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Dvorak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hartviksen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Toscano
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.