IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Skime Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Thief River Falls USHS-MN 27 18 22 40 1.482 0.1876 0.1876 0.3597 0.3597
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 32 11 10 21 0.656 0.0836 0.0836 0.2076 0.2076
2021-22 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 22 29 51 1.109 0.1412 0.1365 0.3507 0.3390
2022-23 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 21 32 53 1.152 0.1468 0.1353 0.3644 0.3357
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 24 9 7 16 0.667
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 24 5 9 14 0.583
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Concordia
+23.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23042
Forward overall
#1282
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Forslund
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Seaverson
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.452 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hartviksen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.