IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Hanes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.0371 0.0371 0.0880 0.0880
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 8 4 12 0.429 0.0827 0.0827 0.1961 0.1961
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 24 8 7 15 0.625
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2023-24 · Wesleyan
+13.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48034
Forward overall
#3292
Forward born in 2004
#1075
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Smith
Bethel · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Ginand
UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Medure
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.