← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Kavulic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 40 5 4 9 0.225 0.0294 0.0294 0.0764 0.0764
2021-22 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 44 22 25 47 1.068 0.1397 0.1380 0.3625 0.3580
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 44 5 7 12 0.273 0.0630 0.0609 0.1334 0.1290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 21 2 2 4 0.191

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32967
Forward overall
#1965
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.