IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Betancourt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New York Apple Core EHL 12 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 42 1 11 12 0.286 0.0316 0.0311 0.0905 0.0891
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.0229 0.0215 0.0655 0.0615
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE GR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27383
Defenseman overall
#3938
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Dobberstein
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Walker
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Mettler
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.