IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Rusina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-09 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HC Olomouc U20 USHL-Style-Czech 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 23 3 6 9 0.391 0.1377 0.1386 0.1919 0.1931
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 33 5 8 13 0.394 0.1386 0.1323 0.1931 0.1843
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38903
Forward overall
#2411
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Murphy
Curry · 2005-06
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Terry
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Edwards
Becker · 2010-11
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.