IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roscoe Eade Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0152 0.0152 0.0350 0.0350
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 40 3 5 8 0.200 0.0462 0.0464 0.0979 0.0983
2022-23 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 1 14 15 0.333 0.0770 0.0733 0.1631 0.1553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20418
Defenseman overall
#3333
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Borges
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Norby
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Gottfried
Tufts · 2015-16
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.