IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel De Mauro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 32 1 8 9 0.281 0.0715 0.0701 0.1167 0.1144
2022-23 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 57 0 12 12 0.210 0.0535 0.0501 0.0873 0.0818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 21 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23910
Defenseman overall
#3642
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Murano
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Chen
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Nachbaur
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.