← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Sykes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 33 3 9 12 0.364 0.0780 0.0777 0.1781 0.1774
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 46 10 18 28 0.609 0.1306 0.1235 0.2981 0.2818
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 FR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 22 3 3 6 0.273

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36053
Forward overall
#1784
Forward born in 2003
#995
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.419 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.