IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Haughian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 39 1 7 8 0.205 0.0445 0.0454 0.1586 0.1618
2022-23 Kemptville 73's CCHL 51 7 10 17 0.333 0.0723 0.0705 0.2578 0.2515
2023-24 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 4 13 17 0.315 0.0683 0.0630 0.2435 0.2246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 22 2 2 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2024-25 · SUNY Oswego
+191.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17984
Defenseman overall
#3182
Defenseman born in 2003
#1453
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Armand Uomoleale
New England · 2014-15
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Meeh
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.