IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Martignetti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0244 0.0244 0.0817 0.0817
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 38 11 13 24 0.632 0.0712 0.0712 0.2149 0.2149
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 23 6 6 12 0.522 0.0763 0.0768 0.2558 0.2575
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 19 2 2 4 0.210
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 27 2 3 5 0.185
2022-23 Stonehill D2 NE10 — 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Stonehill
+79.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8866
Defenseman overall
#1991
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Poston
Concordia (WI) · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Edwards
Tufts · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.