IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Higgs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Collingwood Blues OJHL 49 28 30 58 1.184 0.3556 0.3935 0.8102 0.8966
2009-10 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 22 34 56 1.167 0.3505 0.3695 0.7986 0.8418
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 RPI D1 ECAC SR 37 14 16 30 0.811
2012-13 RPI D1 ECAC JR 33 1 16 17 0.515
2011-12 RPI D1 ECAC SO 34 3 20 23 0.676
2010-11 RPI D1 ECAC FR 33 9 12 21 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2010-11 · RPI
+96.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11498
Forward overall
#456
Forward born in 1992
#315
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Silcoff
Middlebury · 2010-11
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.