IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 9 2 2 4 0.444 0.0566 0.0566 0.1406 0.1406
2021-22 Butte Irish NA3HL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0425 0.0434 0.1054 0.1075
2022-23 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 31 3 19 22 0.710 0.0904 0.0881 0.2245 0.2189
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 56 21 20 41 0.732 0.1247 0.1135 0.3103 0.2825
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 19 2 1 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · Manhattanville
+78.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33465
Forward overall
#2019
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morley Phillips
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braxton Collins
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Timothy Baylis
Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.