IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 9 2 2 4 0.444 0.0492 0.0492 0.1408 0.1408
2021-22 Butte Irish NA3HL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0369 0.0376 0.1056 0.1077
2022-23 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 31 3 19 22 0.710 0.0785 0.0765 0.2248 0.2192
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 56 21 20 41 0.732 0.1043 0.0950 0.3037 0.2765
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 19 2 1 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · Manhattanville
+110.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33168
Forward overall
#2013
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Gallo
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kane Durment
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.