IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luca Maiuri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 47 5 4 9 0.192 0.0273 0.0285 0.0795 0.0830
2022-23 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 56 10 11 21 0.375 0.0534 0.0534 0.1556 0.1557
2023-24 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 58 11 14 25 0.431 0.0614 0.0582 0.1788 0.1696
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast SO 24 3 1 4 0.167
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49803
Forward overall
#3350
Forward born in 2003
#1187
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Granville
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lance Wheeler
St. John's · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.