IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lance Wheeler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-12-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 47 3 14 17 0.362 0.1011 0.0984 0.2496 0.2428
2004-05 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 49 7 14 21 0.429 0.1198 0.1105 0.2958 0.2728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. John's D3 — SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2007-08 St. John's D3 — JR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 St. John's D3 — SO 14 0 4 4 0.286
2005-06 St. John's D3 — FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10700
Defenseman overall
#1145
Defenseman born in 1984
#3348
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic DiMambro
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Heinold
New England · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Fudger
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.