IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Bright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 34 1 7 8 0.235 0.0265 0.0278 0.0799 0.0839
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 36 3 6 9 0.250 0.0366 0.0377 0.1225 0.1262
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 39 1 5 6 0.154 0.0225 0.0220 0.0753 0.0738
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 20 0 2 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Lebanon Valley
+274.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22196
Defenseman overall
#3628
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bo Clark
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Bone
Johnson & Wales · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gaskin
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.